Supreme Court Upholds the Right to Sue Los Angeles Police for Concealing Evidence in Walker Case
In an article published today, the
reports that the U.S. Supreme Court let stand a civil jury verdict against two Los Angeles police detectives for concealing evidence, causing an innocent man, Michael Walker, to be kept in jail for 27 months awaiting trial.
Walker, who has since passed away, was arrested in August 2005 as a suspect in a store robbery after a store clerk said Walker looked like the middle-aged black man who had robbed the store just a few days prior. Although no evidence was found linking Walker to the robbery, his arrest led to him being considered a prime suspect in a chain of similar robberies in the area, writes the
Over a dozen robberies were connected by the thief’s pattern of giving misspelled hand-written notes to cashiers demanding money.
According to the
LAPD detectives Steven Moody and Robert Pulido were adamant about keeping Walker in jail while the investigation continued, and filed a report which told prosecutors that since Walker’s arrest the robbery spree had stopped. However, two more robberies that involved the same hand-written notes occurred a couple days after Walker’s arrest, providing evidence that Walker was not the right man. The detectives later testified that they were aware of the robberies but withheld this information from prosecutors, writes the
reports that charges against Walker were finally dropped after his attorneys learned that Walker’s fingerprints were not found at the store where he was arrested and that the fingerprints at the crime scene matched those of another man who had been arrested while fleeing from a store robbery a month after Walker’s arrest. Walker had been detained for 27 months, and, upon his release, he sued the LAPD and the detectives for concealing evidence which would have proved his innocence much earlier.
In refusing to hear an appeal from the city, the Supreme Court let stand a decision from the Court of Appeals for the 9
Circuit that found that the Constitution bars “prolonged” pre-trial detention when police fail to disclose evidence pointing to innocence.
Leave a Reply
Thank you for visiting us. You can learn more about how we consider cases here. Please avoid sharing any personal information in the comments below and join us in making this a hate-speech free and safe space for everyone.