Still No Justice for Clemente Aguirre-Jarquin

03.21.18 By Innocence Staff

Clemente Aguirre

Clemente Aguirre

Andrew Cohen has written an article for the Brennan Center for Justice detailing the continuing struggle for justice for Clemente Aguirre-Jarquin.

In 2006, Aguirre-Jarquin was convicted and sentenced to death for the double murder of his neighbors, Cheryl Williams and her mother Carol Bareis. But after being sent to death row, his lawyers, with assistance from the Innocence Project, secured DNA evidence revealing that the crime was likely committed by William’s severely mentally challenged daughter, Samantha Williams — whose blood was found in multiple locations at the scene, and who explicitly confessed to the crime on several occasions to multiple people.

Despite this powerful new evidence, the judge, Jessica Recksiedler, refused to grant Mr. Aguirre a new trial. She later submitted her opinion in support of her application when seeking a promotion to the Florida appeals court. But that ruling was unanimously reversed by the Florida Supreme Court, which found that the new evidence would likely lead to Mr. Aguirre’s acquittal. The case was then sent back to Judge Recksiedler for retrial.

As Cohen notes, Judge Recksiedler demonstrated troubling evidence of bias against Aguirre-Jarquin during jury selection that began last month, including falsely telling jurors that Aguirre-Jarquin had pled guilty to the crime. There was also evidence that some potential jurors expressed anti-immigrant bias against Aguirre-Jarquin, who, originally from Honduras, was in the country without legal papers when he was arrested.

The judge eventually recused herself from the case, and as Cohen notes, that gives prosecutors another opportunity to drop the case. He writes: “Any trial judge who is faithful to the Constitution, any trial judge willing to protect Aguirre-Jarquin’s fair trial rights, any trial judge capable of honestly assessing the evidence here, will see how hollow the state’s case has become and how likely it will be permeated by undue prejudice. If it proceeds to trial it will end either in an acquittal or in another conviction that will not withstand appeal. And what a waste that would be.”

Read the full piece here.

Leave a Reply

Thank you for visiting us. You can learn more about how we consider cases here. Please avoid sharing any personal information in the comments below and join us in making this a hate-speech free and safe space for everyone.

This field is required.
This field is required.
This field is required.

Maureen Tracey March 22, 2018 at 3:24 pm Reply   

What a travesty of justice!! That judge SHOULD BE DISBARRED!! The State of Florida is a JOKE for GOOD REASON!! SHAME ON Judge Recksiedler, I don’t know how that DISHONERABLE woman sleeps at night!! She’s REPREHENSIBLE!! This makes me SO ANGRY I could spit! I didn’t know anything about this case until I just read about it now and now I’m absolutely fuming!! I abhor these people that abuse their positions of power and feel VERY STRONGLY that once they do, they should be stripped of their positions and ANY and ALL other cases ought to be looked into! It’s highly unlikely that this is a one shot deal! I’m willing to bet that her bigotry and prejudicial attitudes have run far, wide, deep and for a long time!!!

We've helped free more than 240 innocent people from prison. Support our work to strengthen and advance the innocence movement.