Science Thursdays: Lab vs. Courtroom – How Much Proof Is Enough?
Tensions between legal and scientific methodologies complicate the acceptance of forensic science, domestic forensic science issues are linked to wrongful convictions and international forensic institutions are shuttering or sputtering. Here’s a roundup of forensic news:
NPR discusses the tension between
integrating a technology in court
and ensuring it is first properly validated.
Norah Rudin and Keith Inman discuss the
principles of science in forensics
and comment on proposed legislation to reform forensic science.
A forensic expert testified in a New Zealand trial that
gunshot residue can linger
in the air after a gunshot is fired, so the presence of residue is not proof that a person fired a gun.
An Arizona woman exonerated of capital murder charges based on
faulty medical evidence
is seeking compensation from Maricopa County.
Drug test results
for a Long Island teen who struck and killed an elderly woman while allegedly intoxicated may be in admissible because of the closure of the Nassau County Police Crime Lab drug unit.
North Carolina State Bureau of Investigation
agent, whose work lead to the wrongful conviction of Gregory Taylor, says he did nothing wrong.
In the UK, private labs testify that the
closure of the national Forensic Science Service
will not have a negative impact on the field.
All three of Calgary’s medical examiners are departing, leaving the city with
no forensic pathologists
Leave a Reply
Thank you for visiting us. You can learn more about how we consider cases here. Please avoid sharing any personal information in the comments below and join us in making this a hate-speech free and safe space for everyone.