Science Thursday: Fake Autopsies, Blood Spatter and Fiber Comparison


Questionable and unreliable forensic evidence is the topic of discussion in courtrooms around the world.  Here’s a round up of forensic news:

Lawyers in a Chicago area murder case

debated the reliability of blood-spatter evidence


An Oklahoma pathologist from the Medical Examiner’s office

testified in court

about a report she submitted on autopsies that she did not actually conduct.

The UK’s Court of Appeal

dismissed Simon Hall’s appeal

in a murder case. The Criminal Cases Review Commission referred this case to the Court of Appeal because the conviction was based in part on questionable fiber identification evidence.

Another Canadian man wrongfully convicted of shaking a baby to death by the testimony of Dr. Charles Smith

was exonerated this week


Leave a Reply

Thank you for visiting us. You can learn more about how we consider cases here. Please avoid sharing any personal information in the comments below and join us in making this a hate-speech free and safe space for everyone.

This field is required.
This field is required.
This field is required.

We've helped free more than 240 innocent people from prison. Support our work to strengthen and advance the innocence movement.