Science Thursday: Fake Autopsies, Blood Spatter and Fiber Comparison
Questionable and unreliable forensic evidence is the topic of discussion in courtrooms around the world. Here’s a round up of forensic news:
Lawyers in a Chicago area murder case
debated the reliability of blood-spatter evidence
An Oklahoma pathologist from the Medical Examiner’s office
testified in court
about a report she submitted on autopsies that she did not actually conduct.
The UK’s Court of Appeal
dismissed Simon Hall’s appeal
in a murder case. The Criminal Cases Review Commission referred this case to the Court of Appeal because the conviction was based in part on questionable fiber identification evidence.
Another Canadian man wrongfully convicted of shaking a baby to death by the testimony of Dr. Charles Smith
was exonerated this week
Leave a Reply
Thank you for visiting us. You can learn more about how we consider cases here. Please avoid sharing any personal information in the comments below and join us in making this a hate-speech free and safe space for everyone.