Pennsylvania Judge Vacates Murder Convictions Based on New Evidence
On Tuesday, a Philadelphia Court of Common Pleas Judge dismissed the murder convictions of two men serving life sentences. The dismissals were based on problems with the eyewitness testimony and on new evidence of another inmate’s confession.
The Associate Press reported that Judge Rose Marie DeFino-Nastasi found the 1998 trial evidence against
Pennsylvania Innocence Project
client Eugene Gilyard and co-defendant Lance Felder to be “ ‘terribly weak.’ ” She ordered new trials for both men
Gilyard and Felder were 18 years old when they were convicted of the 1995 shooting death of a restaurant owner. The victim’s daughter, the only eyewitness of the crime, contradicted her description of the shooter several times. In 1995, she told police the suspect was light-skinned, but at the trial, she said he was dark-skinned. She also said that the perpetrators were at least six feet tall and looked about 26 years old. Gilyard is 5’8” and Felder is 5’6”; they were only 16 at the time of the crime. According to the Associated Press, DeFino-Nastasi said,
“ ‘We can’t have these inconsistencies in a case based solely on identification.’ ”
In addition to the eyewitness misidentification, the Pennsylvania Innocence Project obtained a 2011 confession of the crime from a man serving a life sentence for another murder. Although the prosecution argued that the man who confessed was offered money by supporters of Gilyard and Felder, Judge DeFino-Nastasi said the man had been named a suspect from the very beginning of the case.
The District Attorney’s Office has 30 days to decide if it will appeal.
Leave a Reply
Thank you for visiting us. You can learn more about how we consider cases here. Please avoid sharing any personal information in the comments below and join us in making this a hate-speech free and safe space for everyone.