Legislation Introduced in Vermont to Prevent Wrongful Convictions


Vermont Sen. Dick Sears, D-Bennington, is co-sponsoring two bills this session that would require all law enforcement agencies to adopt a model policy on how to administer live or photo-lineups and would call for the recording of interrogations in homicide and sexual assault cases.


The most common element in all wrongful convictions later overturned by DNA evidence has been eyewitness misidentification. Misleading lineup methods have been used for decades without serious scrutiny, and Vermont has the opportunity to implement best practices that would prevent eyewitness misidentification.


The electronic recording of interrogations, from the reading of Miranda rights onward, is the single best reform available to stem the tide of false confessions which contributed to approximately 25% of the wrongful convictions overturned with DNA evidence. The Brattleboro Reformer reported that even though most of the larger police departments already have recording equipment, the recording bill would specifically provide ways of helping underfunded departments.

“What these reforms would really accomplish, especially from the eyewitness front, is ensuring that all law enforcement agencies are operating on the same page and carrying out procedures consistently,” said Rebecca Brown, nationwide director of state policy reform for The Innocence Project.

According to Rick Gauthier, executive director of the Vermont Criminal Justice Training Council, officials at the local level are already receiving training on how to interact with witnesses without asking leading questions and how to properly handle cases of eyewitness identification and misidentification. Gauthier supports the bills and said his council has the same goals as Brown, who helped draft the legislation.

“The worst thing we can do is put someone who’s not guilty behind bars,” said Sears. “For the person who’s been convicted and sentenced to incarceration that’s a horrible thing for them to have to go through when they’re not guilty, and also, that means that the person who is guilty is still out there.”

Read the

full article



More about

improving eyewitness identification procedures


mandatory recording of interrogations


Leave a Reply

Thank you for visiting us. You can learn more about how we consider cases here. Please avoid sharing any personal information in the comments below and join us in making this a hate-speech free and safe space for everyone.

This field is required.
This field is required.
This field is required.

We've helped free more than 240 innocent people from prison. Support our work to strengthen and advance the innocence movement.