Judge Bars False Confession Experts


A Michigan judge ruled today that two false confession experts couldn’t testify at the trial of a man accused of killing two people.

Jerome Kowalski is charged with shooting his brother and sister-in-law  in 2008, and police videotaped him admitting guilt at the end of an interrogation. Kowalski’s attorney is seeking to present evidence regarding false confessions and the possibility that Kowalski gave a false confession under duress. At a pre-trial hearing the judge heard testimony from

University of San Francisco law professor Richard Leo

, a false confession expert, and psychologist Jeffrey Wendt.

District Court Judge Theresa Brennan called the testimony of two expert witnesses — a California law professor and a clinical psychiatrist — "unreliable and irrelevant."

Defense attorney Walter Piszczatowski said he plans to appeal the ruling because his client's Sixth Amendment rights to present a proper defense were denied.

…Although Jerome Kowalski is videotaped as to saying, "I did it," attorneys claimed that there are some discrepancies in his statements and evidence at the crime scene.

Read the full story here

. (Detroit News, 07/27/09)

About 25% of wrongful convictions overturned by DNA testing involved a false confession or admission.

Read about how false confessions happen

– and

the reforms that can help prevent them


Leave a Reply

Thank you for visiting us. You can learn more about how we consider cases here. Please avoid sharing any personal information in the comments below and join us in making this a hate-speech free and safe space for everyone.

This field is required.
This field is required.
This field is required.

Maxwell Riemer May 15, 2016 at 3:39 pm Reply   

why cant i read about how false confessions happen, or how to prevent them, please fix the link.

We've helped free more than 240 innocent people from prison. Support our work to strengthen and advance the innocence movement.