News 09.08.17

Wrongly Convicted Forced into Plea Deals to Gain Freedom

By Innocence Staff

Many individuals who have been exonerated of wrongful convictions recount the weight that was lifted when their cases were overturned and the state dropped the charges against them. Sadly, not all wrongfully convicted people released from prison enjoy that same sense of relief. As a recent story by ProPublica reveals, in too many wrongful conviction cases, innocent people are pressured by prosecutors into taking plea deals in exchange for their freedom, when, in reality, solid evidence demonstrates that full exonerations are in order.

In 1985, George Seward was convicted of a murder in Baltimore County, despite there being no physical evidence linking him to the crime and his having a solid alibi that was confirmed by his boss. Seward maintained his innocence, and after more than three decades in prison, he was finally released. But his freedom came at a cost.

Rather than dropping the charges against Seward, prosecutors decided to retry him even though a judge granted him a writ of innocence based on employment records that “thoroughly” exculpated Seward, reports ProPublica. Rather than risk additional time in prison awaiting trial, Seward agreed to take an Alford Plea offered by the prosecution, which allowed him to maintain his innocence while not contesting the prosecution and the conviction. Ultimately, he cannot legally clear his name or record.

Seward’s case is just one example where “[p]ersuasive innocence claims were met with refusals by the state’s attorney’s office to reexamine the cases, sometimes despite—or perhaps because of—discoveries of official misconduct,” writes ProPublica. According to its report, ProPublica revealed that over the past 20 years, at least eight men in Baltimore County and City who had convincing claims of evidence were not exonerated, but rather offered plea deals.

Read more from ProPublica on how wrongly convicted people are forced into plea deals despite overwhelming evidence of innocence here. Read the tragic result that Innocence Project client Chris Conover suffered from one of these so-called “plea deals” here.

Leave a reply

Thank you for visiting us. You can learn more about how we consider cases here. Please avoid sharing any personal information in the comments below and join us in making this a hate-speech free and safe space for everyone.

  1. Melissa Leigh says:

    The victim in the Seward case was not murdered, she survived the rape / robbery / shooting and I identified Seward. The records stating he was at work we’re not available until post conviction. Thank god this innocent man was freed but please don’t twist the facts. They are enough as is.

  2. Lanelle Belicek says:

    When will innocence programs finally realize that many people that take the plea were put under unbelievable pressure to take the plea and sometimes promised that if they took the plea they could come back on a 1169. Problem with the 1169 is it requires big money that many don’t have and that is why they ended up with court appointed attorneys that thought the plea was the best thing and then they could move on to the next case. It is so aggravating that innocence programs will not even look into a case because of a plea. Do they just think – took a plea – guilty and don’t deserve a chance to prove otherwise. My son was a victim of a plea deal where they not only pressured him but me as well to force the plea. I don’t have a 350K for a retainer to pursue his case and there is not an innocence project that will even look at his case.

Thanks for your comment

Press "Enter" or click on the arrow to show results.