News 09.29.15

The Next Step in the Fight to Prove Joseph Buffey’s Innocence


Next week, the West Virginia Supreme will hear arguments in the case of Innocence Project client Joseph Buffey, who is currently serving 70 to 100 years for a 2001 rape and robbery that DNA evidence proves he did not commit. Innocence Project attorneys will argue that Buffey’s conviction should be overturned. They will present evidence showing that in 2002 the prosecution violated Buffey’s constitutional rights by offering him a plea deal when, in fact, they possessed DNA results proving his innocence, but neglected to turn over that evidence to the defense.  

In 2002, at the urging of his lawyer, Buffey entered a guilty plea to raping and robbing an 83-year-old Clarksburg, Virginia, woman in her home, although he maintained his innocence. In subsequent years, the Innocence Project secured evidence which proved that Buffey was right. Not only did the organization secure DNA testing that excluded Buffey from the crime, but it also uncovered evidence that the prosecution was in possession of DNA evidence before Buffey was sentenced for the crime excluding him as the perpetrator.

Pursuant to

Brady v. Maryland

, the prosecution is required to turn over evidence before trial that could help prove the defendant’s innocence. But, as explained in yesterday’s

New York Times

, the Buffey case is in some regards exceptional. Contrary to most states, neither the U.S. Supreme Court nor the West Virginia Supreme Court have ruled whether the duty to disclose exculpatory evidence applies when there is a guilty plea.

In addition to their arguments that Buffey’s constitutional rights are grounds for reversal of Buffey’s conviction, the Innocence Project has additional evidence that Buffey was wrongfully convicted. As is highlighted in the

Times

article, in 2012 the organization won a court order to run DNA evidence from the crime scene through the national DNA database known as CODIS. The results pointed to another man, Adam Bowers, who has a criminal record and who lived near the victim at the time.  Although the victim always maintained that the crime was committed by a single perpetrator, the prosecution later claimed that Buffey somehow acted in concert with Bowers.  After the Clark County district court refused to overturn Buffey’s conviction, the Innocence Project appealed the case to the West Virginia Supreme Court.

Read the

New York Times

article

here

Learn more about the Buffey case

here

 and

here

.

 

 

 


 

Leave a reply

Thank you for visiting us. You can learn more about how we consider cases here. Please avoid sharing any personal information in the comments below and join us in making this a hate-speech free and safe space for everyone.

Thanks for your comment

Featured news

Press "Enter" or click on the arrow to show results.

Search