Supreme Court to Hear Prosecutorial Misconduct Case


Next Tuesday, the U.S. Supreme Court will reopen the issue of prosecutorial misconduct when it hears oral arguments in

Smith v. Cain

, a Louisiana case where the defendant is seeking a new trial based on evidence withheld from his attorneys at his original trial.

Writing in the Washington Post yesterday, Robert Barnes examined the Smith case and drew parallels to the Prosecutorial Oversight Campaign, which the Innocence Project launched last week with partners at the Veritas Initiative, Innocence Project New Orleans and Voices of Innocence. Above is a video of the

Prosecutorial Oversight

launch last week in Washington, D.C.

Barnes writes:

The new case, Smith v. Cain , is not about punishing prosecutors. It is about whether withholding evidence should mean a new trial for Juan Smith, who prosecutors said was involved in a gangland-style shooting that left five dead. Prosecutors have an obligation under a nearly 50-year-old Supreme Court precedent in Brady v. Maryland to turn over any evidence material to a defendant’s guilt or punishment.

The case is expected to be determined by its specific facts rather than the potential for a new examination of Brady. It also seems not coincidental that it involves New Orleans prosecutors.


Barnes’ full post

, and visit the Prosecutorial Oversight


for more background on the new campaign.

Leave a Reply

Thank you for visiting us. You can learn more about how we consider cases here. Please avoid sharing any personal information in the comments below and join us in making this a hate-speech free and safe space for everyone.

This field is required.
This field is required.
This field is required.

We've helped free more than 240 innocent people from prison. Support our work to strengthen and advance the innocence movement.