News 03.10.11

Science Thursdays: Lab vs. Courtroom – How Much Proof Is Enough?

Tensions between legal and scientific methodologies complicate the acceptance of forensic science, domestic forensic science issues are linked to wrongful convictions and international forensic institutions are shuttering or sputtering.  Here’s a roundup of forensic news:

NPR discusses the tension between

integrating a technology in court

and ensuring it is first properly validated.




Norah Rudin and Keith Inman discuss the

principles of science in forensics

and comment on proposed legislation to reform forensic science.

A forensic expert testified in a New Zealand trial that

gunshot residue can linger

in the air after a gunshot is fired, so the presence of residue is not proof that a person fired a gun. 

An Arizona woman exonerated of capital murder charges based on

faulty medical evidence

is seeking compensation from Maricopa County.


Drug test results

 for a Long Island teen who struck and killed an elderly woman while allegedly intoxicated may be in admissible because of the closure of the Nassau County Police Crime Lab drug unit.




The

North Carolina State Bureau of Investigation

agent, whose work lead to the wrongful conviction of Gregory Taylor, says he did nothing wrong. 




In the UK, private labs testify that the

closure of the national Forensic Science Service

will not have a negative impact on the field.

All three of Calgary’s medical examiners are departing, leaving the city with

no forensic pathologists

Leave a reply

Thank you for visiting us. You can learn more about how we consider cases here. Please avoid sharing any personal information in the comments below and join us in making this a hate-speech free and safe space for everyone.

Thanks for your comment

Press "Enter" or click on the arrow to show results.

Search