Science Thursdays: Crime Labs Under Investigation for Inconsistent Results


As a result of inconsistent crime lab work, the US Army joins New York and North Carolina in instituting a review of cases, and courts in the US and UK consider how to deal with weak forensic evidence.  Here’s a roundup of forensic news:

The US Army Criminal Investigation Laboratory kept a three-year investigation of its poor laboratory practices



The North Carolina State Bureau of Investigation has identified

74 cases

on top of the original 229 slated for review as a result of the NC crime laboratory’s poor scientific work.

A New York judge has been selected to preside over the

legal challenges

to evidence processed in the now shuttered drug unit of the Nassau County Crime Laboratory.

In separate cases, Pennsylvania courts will hear challenges on

arson and fingerprint evidence


UK courts will now consider a

pre-trial reliability test

for the admissibility of forensic evidence.

State budget cuts could eliminate

181 of the 600 staff

at New York City’s Office of the Chief Medical Examiner.

A University of Virginia professor who studies wrongful convictions will release a new book this spring titled, ”

Convicting the Innocent: Where Criminal Prosecutions Go Wrong


Leave a Reply

Thank you for visiting us. You can learn more about how we consider cases here. Please avoid sharing any personal information in the comments below and join us in making this a hate-speech free and safe space for everyone.

This field is required.
This field is required.
This field is required.

We've helped free more than 240 innocent people from prison. Support our work to strengthen and advance the innocence movement.