Science Thursday – July 19, 2012
The science committees of both houses of Congress introduced a bill to address forensic science issues, hair comparison is still used beyond its scientific parameters, and problems are identified at crime labs in North Carolina and Minnesota. Here’s this week’s round up of forensic news:
Sen. John D. (Jay) Rockefeller IV of the Senate Commerce Committee and Reps. Eddie Bernice Johnson, Donna Edwards and Daniel Lipinski of the House Committee on Science introduced the
Forensic Science and Standards Act of 2012
amid concerns raised by a recent Washington Post investigative series that exposed the
use of faulty microscopic hair comparisons in the wrongful convictions of three men
Despite the recent Washington, DC cases that demonstrated the problems with microscopic hair comparison techniques,
the practice is still being used
The St. Paul Police Crime Lab shut down its controlled drug analysis unit after a court case revealed that the lab
lacks written standard operating procedures for drug analysis and evidence handling
, and conducts no ongoing proficiency testing for staff in its controlled substances laboratory.
North Carolina prosecutors have been scrambling to identify cases that could have been
compromised by forensic analysts who did not pass their certification tests
. The Buncombe County District Attorney filed a motion to compel the state to turn over information about the failed exams.
Leave a Reply
Thank you for visiting us. You can learn more about how we consider cases here. Please avoid sharing any personal information in the comments below and join us in making this a hate-speech free and safe space for everyone.