Events 01.07.16
Thank you for visiting us. You can learn more about how we consider cases here. Please avoid sharing any personal information in the comments below and join us in making this a hate-speech free and safe space for everyone.
Dear Friend, We launch into 2023, with big, ambitious plans for the coming year, buoyed by last year’s successes — including six ...
News01.26.23
New DNA evidence identifies one unknown male perpetrator, proving Mr. Schweitzer and his co-defendants’ innocence in 1991 murder and rape.
News01.24.23
Thanks for your comment
I have started reading about prosecutorial misconducts. It is not a thing to see people be convicted of crimes they never committed and spent their life in various stages of prison. I have one question on this? When we suspect people as a criminals do we bring abusive trials first before we prove that they are criminals or put them on trial after we make sure that they are criminals. The reason I say this is that we see people has been placed on abusive trials before any evidence that could 100% prove their criminal activity which is damaging both resource and health wise. Is there any time limit a “suspected criminal” could stay on trial?