How Homophobia Led to the Wrongful Conviction of Miguel Castillo

07.06.16 By Kavish Harjai

How Homophobia Led to the Wrongful Conviction of Miguel Castillo

In recognition of Pride month, we are highlighting stories of exonerees who were wrongfully convicted on the basis of their perceived sexual orientation or gender identity. These stories serve as examples of how homophobia, transphobia, and general anti-LGBTQ sentiments have been ingrained in the criminal justice system.

By showcasing these stories, we hope to inspire people to continue to fight against the injustices that plague a significant part of our society while also celebrating the LGBTQ exonerees, lawyers, allies, and community who have stoop up for the wrongfully convicted.

In 1989, Miguel Castillo was arrested and accused of murdering and dismembering his neighbor Rene Chinea — a 50-year-old gay Cuban immigrant — in Chicago. The police were led to Castillo, eight months after discovering Mr. Chinea’s body, by a tip from another person suspected of committing the crime.

The police claimed that Mr. Castillo confessed to the crime, but Mr. Castillo said he always maintained his innocence. Mr. Castillo said that detectives beat him during their interrogation and when he still refused to confess, they fabricated a confession for him. Two years later, Mr. Castillo was wrongfully convicted almost entirely based this fabricated confession, according to Northwestern Law.

The police were convinced that the person who killed Mr. Chinea was also gay.

“This belief was based on the premise that gay men who are lovers or roommates are ‘particularly violent’ when they fight, often engaging in gruesome-type, serious cuttings, and it shaped the investigation from the moment police responded to the scene,” wrote the authors of Queer (In)Justice, a book about the queer experience in the criminal justice system.

The police’s fabricated confession said that Mr. Castillo had killed Mr. Chinea because Mr. Chinea had cheated on him, according to the People’s Law Office website. However, Mr. Castillo identifies as a heterosexual man and no evidence supported that he was in a relationship with Mr. Chinea.

Though Mr. Castillo was in jail on unrelated charges at the time Mr. Chinea was murdered, he was convicted and sentenced to 48 years in prison. He had served nearly a decade in prison when his attorney requested a new trial based on new evidence.

Mr. Castillo was represented by the People’s Law Office, a law office based in Chicago that focuses on defending LGBTQ people in post-conviction proceedings.

In 2000, Mr. Castillo’s attorneys presented new evidence in post-conviction hearings that confirmed that Mr. Castillo could not have committed the murder because he was incarcerated at the time it took place. And this evidence led to a further investigation that resulted in a retrial and Mr. Castillo’s exoneration in 2001.

Mr. Castillo later sued the Chicago Police Department for framing him in the murder and settled with a $1.2 million award in 2004.

Leave a Reply

Thank you for visiting us. You can learn more about how we consider cases here. Please avoid sharing any personal information in the comments below and join us in making this a hate-speech free and safe space for everyone.

This field is required.
This field is required.
This field is required.

Valera Ghali November 16, 2016 at 11:50 pm Reply   

I am taking a wrongful convictions course at John Carroll University and our final project is to dig deep into the details of a wrongful convictions case and explain the contributing factors and possible reforms to the class. My group and I would love to do this case and were wondering if you have access to the trial transcripts and case files or know how we can get them.