California Exoneree Franky Carrillo featured in Netflix’s “The Innocence Files”
Carrillo is one of eight exonerees whose story is featured in the Netflix docuseries “The Innocence Filesu0022rn
04.01.20 By Innocence Staff
The crime
In January 1991, 41-year-old Donald Sarpy was standing in the driveway of his home in Lynwood, California, when he was killed in a drive-by shooting. Sarpy’s son and five of his friends witnessed the murder.
Investigation and Trial
Sixteen-year-old Franky Carrillo became a suspect after police mistakenly identified him as the shooter in another incident. Scott Turner, an eyewitness who was shown Carrillo’s photograph on the night of Sarpy’s murder, later identified Carrillo as the shooter.
Turner then told Sarpy’s son, Dameon, and the four other friends who were present said that Carrillo was the gunman. Six months later, Dameon and the four friends identified Carrillo in a lineup. All six witnesses testified at Carrillo’s first trial, which ended in a mistrial when the jury was unable to reach a unanimous verdict.
Although Turner recanted his testimony before Carrillo’s second trial, the other five eyewitnesses continued to identify Carrillo as the gunman. No other physical evidence linked Carrillo to the crime. In June 1992, the jury convicted him of murder and six counts of attempted murder.
“I was very afraid, but I think being afraid was one of the elements that kind of kept me alive.”
At Carrillo’s sentencing, a criminal defense attorney told the judge that he represented a man who was at the murder scene and could testify that Carrillo was not involved. However, the judge would not let the witness testify. Carrillo was then sentenced to life in prison.
“I was very afraid, but I think being afraid was one of the elements that kind of kept me alive because it put me very, very aware of my surroundings,” Carrillo told KNBC in Los Angeles about being in prison.
Post-Conviction Investigation
In March 2003, while reviewing a defense investigator’s files, Carrillo discovered notes from an interview of the man who was not allowed to testify at his sentencing. According to the notes, the man confessed that he was actually the gunman.
Ellen Eggers, a deputy state public defender, met Carrillo in prison and took on his case. Eggers ultimately connected Carrillo to the Northern California Innocence Project (NCIP) and the law firm of Morrison & Foerster, which handled his case pro bono.
After Sarpy’s son, Dameon, was informed of the notes, he admitted that he had not actually been able to see the gunman at the time of the shooting, but identified Carrillo because he was told by Turner that Carrillo was the perpetrator.
Ultimately, all six eyewitnesses recanted at a post-trial hearing on a motion for a new trial. Turner also testified that Carrillo had been pointed out to him by the police, leading him to encourage his friends to identify Carrillo.
“I am uniquely positioned to represent families who are struggling to earn a living …”
NCIP, Morrison & Foerster and Eggers also convinced the court to return to the scene of the crime to reenact the shooting as described by the witnesses, which demonstrated that it was physically impossible for the witnesses to have seen the perpetrator’s face.
On March 14, 2011, Los Angeles County Superior Court Judge Paul Bacigalupo vacated Carrillo’s conviction based on the eyewitness recantations and two other men having confessed to the shooting. Carrillo was released from custody that day, after having spent over two decades in prison for a crime he didn’t commit. In April 2011, the prosecution dismissed the case.
Life after Exoneration
Carrillo filed a federal civil rights lawsuit seeking damages from the city of Los Angeles. The case was settled in 2016 for $10.1 million. He also filed a claim for compensation from the state of California and in 2014 he was awarded $683,300.
In May 2016, Carrillo graduated from Loyola Marymount University. In 2017, he announced his campaign to represent California’s 51st Assembly District. Earlier this year, he was elected to the Los Angeles County Democratic Central Committee of the 51st Assembly District.
“Because of my experience, I am uniquely positioned to represent families who are struggling to earn a living, find good schools for their children and maintain faith in the face of adversity,” Carrillo said of his campaign in 2017. “I know firsthand what it means to face hardship, and how important it is to know you have an advocate in your corner.”
Featured in the Netflix series “The Innocence Files”
Carrillo is one of eight people whose story is featured in the Innocence Project-inspired Netflix docuseries “The Innocence Files” now available for streaming worldwide.
Leave a Reply
Thank you for visiting us. You can learn more about how we consider cases here. Please avoid sharing any personal information in the comments below and join us in making this a hate-speech free and safe space for everyone.
April 10, 2024 at 5:19 pm
August 2, 2021 at 8:42 pm
I too have known and watched the discrimination and favoritism of our beloved authorities. Why they must put the winning ahead of actual human lives is beyond understanding. The Innocence Project is a God send as is any other organization that sees through the truth for human beings. Your documentary is one place to show the truth to so many people who have no idea what unfortunate discriminatory acts our leaders are performing in the name of progress or success. Yes, many prosecutors, sheriff depts., police and detectives, correction officers, wardens, etc, are honest leaders that are holding our hopes that justice is certainly blind. However, we need never close our eyes to the cases the Innocence Project has seen to fruition of who is really innocent and who is really guilty in our prisons. The average person has no idea what really goes on. God bless those who support righteous innocence.
I support The Innocecense Project thru and thru. What happened to Franky is outrageous. My question is from a legal standpoint. Why could Frankie settle for $10M and someone like Thomas Haynesworth was only able to settle for $1M. Is it be cause in Franky’s case the police complicity fall under Federal jurisdiction.
Keep up the great work.